Yes, we have major differences with the U.S. already with two official languages and with metric rather than imperial. There's always those. I fully support what you're trying to do. I think it's a good initiative, and we'll get down to vote on it at some point. It's all about predictability and the stability of trade corridors. As you rightly point out, we're a large agricultural nation, but we don't develop a lot of these pesticides and chemicals. They're done elsewhere and then we import them. To have that ease of importation, we have the own use program and different things. There's a bit of a stigma attached when you have to go through all that extra work to get a product here. We already import the finished goods with those chemicals applied, but we don't allow the chemical here. It's problematic as well, so I support what you're doing.
Ms. Coombs, you also talked about the changes to the environment side in clause 31. This is basically targeting flow-through product.