We've begun informal discussions with the department, and I think they're open to finding a way to limit what we call the “belongs to” wording, the language we find problematic.
That's why at the beginning I said if it's not this specific amendment, if it's something else that comes back from the department, we would be open to a discussion because there are more ways to get to what we need. Whatever language gets us to that point we're fine with that.