I think separating out the definition of “package” from “label” will enable exactly what you're saying. It will enable that trade to take place for products in transit. We're not proposing any changes to that element. The new label definition is quite a bit broader in scope. We applaud the attempt to add that “belonging to” language because it foresees an electronic label environment in the future, but we think it may be unnecessarily broad. Any language that can help focus that a little bit, we would be supportive of.
On October 4th, 2016. See this statement in context.