We don't use full employment in our models. We let the labour adjustments take place, and we measure the number of employed people in the entire economy. That's the reason for the difference between the projected baseline and the TPP scenario.
Other models use different definitions of full employment. These definitions are tautological, in a sense, because every worker who is displaced and has lost his skills and is no longer, after a period of time, looking for a job is therefore not considered part of the labour force any longer.
That is how in these other models—not ours—you can get away with the problem of the unemployed, because they simply disappear from your definition of the unemployed. In our model, we don't do that. We measure the number of employed people in different scenarios.