We don't have the same provisions. Anyway, that's fine. Thank you.
Derek, thank you for your presentation. Of course, the softwood lumber dispute with the U.S. has driven us into other markets. You made that point. I couldn't agree with you more. We've done the same thing with agriculture, where there's far less reliance on the American market.
Diversity in trade is the same as diversity in your stock or investment portfolio. It's a good thing, so the more trade routes that we have the better.
One thing that is very predominant in the TPP is the environmental chapter. I've seen a lot of documentation which shows that a cubic metre of wood growth sequesters a tonne of carbon. When you talk about meeting your requirements under Canadian proposals, you're actually already there with the tonnage of growth that we see in our forests and the carbon that's sequestered. How do we get credit for that?