In CETA, we negotiated an outcome that does not have any built-in safeguards of their own. There are no safeguards either way in any sector in CETA, but what we did do when it came to agriculture is that we preserved our right to be able to use the WTO special safeguard for agricultural products. We did not have an outcome that allowed the EU to use that WTO special safeguard for agricultural products.
This is something the Walloons were concerned about, because they saw it as unfair that we would retain the safeguard and they would not. In the discussions they had with the European Commission, what they were talking about was the WTO general safeguard, which applies to all products and is frankly not that effective for agricultural products. We and other countries have rarely used it for that. As part of that declaration, though, Belgium wanted to be able to look at what was coming in, see if there were these types of market imbalances, and see if that would provide the kind of evidence that would be required for the WTO general safeguard.
I'll be honest. I don't think we're too worried about that, particularly given the size of the access we have for pork and beef—which is where the concern is—into the EU market, which is generally less than 1% of their market. That's not going to cause real injury to their market, which is one of the requirements under the WTO general safeguard. They will certainly be doing their assessments and their economic analysis of the product coming in, but in terms of the tools they have, at least under CETA, to address that, there's not really anything.