That's a fantastic question. I think you know that Gus Van Harten, Michael Geist, and other experts have said that much of what we want to accomplish could be accomplished through federal courts or state-to-state dispute mechanisms like we have through the WTO, and if we get rid of NAFTA, we had that in the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement.
The problem it presents is that the company then has to convince their country that it's a worthwhile case to bring forward, but we think that's a useful step so that you can't bring forward frivolous cases. Certainly, if you're talking about contracts and about being treated fairly, if we don't respect those contracts, that can fall under federal courts, federal jurisdiction. We don't see the necessity for investor-state, and we think it will fail in Europe because of the insistence on it.