One question I asked Steve Verheul was whether there was ever a point in time when we said, “Let's not have this provision; let's not do this. We're between developed countries. We don't need these ISDS mechanisms. We can do a state-to-state resolution.”
I wonder whether you could give your thoughts on that. If we had state-to-state resolution rather than this particular mechanism, would that not strengthen our relationship in this trade agreement and provide a mechanism for people that didn't involve this separate court system?