No.
The changes we're proposing are all consistent with CETA. It's just the way the changes are being interpreted in the Patent Act. As I said, 30 pages of this bill are about the Patent Act. We have gone through it very carefully and have noted that in some cases changes are not required by CETA; there are housekeeping changes that introduce problems.
The biggest area with which we have concerns relates, as I said, to section 55 of the act, which provides for regulations around patent infringement actions and how they're interpreted. There are some significant changes in the wording to that section, which, again, are not required by CETA. We do not understand why those changes are being made. We believe that they could lead to expanded powers, regulatory-making powers, and they could also change the way the courts are interpreting those regulations in ways that would be harmful to our sector. That's why we're concerned about those.