Mr. Chair, may I just say something in response?
I think we're focusing on tariffs, and tariffs are important for movement of goods. The opposition to the TPP terms has never been on tariffs. You can expand markets, you can drop tariffs and allow people to sell, and the devil is in the detail, the regional value content.
If you kept the regional value content at a level that underpinned the proposition of buying locally, that would be a little different from saying that on some auto parts, we're at 35% local value content. Just to be clear, that's 65% of that part. It doesn't have to come from a TPP country.
If you make the premise that you can buy more parts from outside TPP countries in lower cost jurisdictions that currently underpin production in Asia, it does not then somehow create a value proposition for new investment in Canada. It does the opposite.