It depends on what the changes are, of course.
In my presentation, I gave the example of the Gordie Howe bridge. To my knowledge, this is the first time in Canada that there have been clauses requiring purchases to be made in Canada or the U.S. This means that there will be North American competition for the project.
Among the major infrastructure projects in Canada, there are three bridges: the Gordie Howe bridge, the Champlain bridge, and the George Massey bridge, in Vancouver. They will all spur strong demand for raw materials, including steel.
As I said, 50% of the work for the Champlain bridge has already been awarded to European companies.
As to the George Massey bridge, for which a bidding process is ongoing, it is clear that a large part of the steel will come from Asia. There will be international and Asian competition. Regardless of what we do in Canada, we will not win.
As to the Gordie Howe bridge, perhaps owing to the U.S. influence in the project, there are buy American clauses. NAFTA will enable us to create jobs and participate in the construction of this bridge. I see a lot of benefits.
In my opinion, it should do more for the public projects that will be funded by our tax dollars.