There are many things.
First, I think that as manufacturers we should be better informed about the recourse available to us, so we are not left on the sidelines. Going back to the example of the steel from Spain, what recourse do I have in that case? I know it is dumping and it is 40% to 50% below what it should be. I can prove that. All I can do, though, is sit there and watch.
So what recourse do I have with the government? What can I do to ensure that steps are taken in response to my appearance before this committee and the comments I am making? That is one thing.
I would also go back to my idea of a “Buy Canadian Act”. The U.S. has had a Buy American Act for a number of years. It is perhaps viewed negatively. In the U.S., the Buy American Act applies at various levels. For the bridge projects, it applies across the board. That means 100% of products and services. The ADF Group was recently awarded a project at New York's Laguardia Airport. It is a major expansion. For this airport, the Buy American Act applies at 50%. That means 50% for the U.S. and 50% for outside companies, which means we can play a role in the project.
In Canada, I think we could get to that point. That possibility should also be explored.