I'll take the first shot at it.
From a steel perspective, I'll start with your second question first. One of the greatest defences that we have against unfair trade from China or other developing nations is the ability to serve customers appropriately and quickly with just-in-time product that goes across the border numerous times and has value added to it. Our supply chain is very tight. You don't need to maintain stock. We can customize. This is one of the great defences that we have.
I spoke very briefly in my remarks about strengthening the rules of origin. Specifically, from a steel perspective, that would apply to manufactured goods containing steel. There would be opportunity there if you were to adjust the rules of origin to move to a “melted and poured” standard, where the steel was actually produced in Canada, in the United States, or in Mexico. You would grow employment that way.
Right now, you can bring in steel from Korea, for instance, and apply a tariff shift to it, and it becomes sort of NAFTA-compliant. When you move away from that, you strengthen the rules of origin, and you have an opportunity to create jobs and economic activity.