That short list you provided represented some of our primary objectives in the negotiations. When it came to environmental services, engineering services, mining services, and construction services, Canadian service providers have an advantage in many of those areas. Those are areas we highlighted as priorities.
Now, part of our other concern with respect to services was that we didn't want other countries to gain advantage over us in the future. We negotiated what's called a “most favoured nation” obligation, which means that if another country in the future—including the U.S., for example—negotiates better access than we have, we will automatically get that access as well.
You also asked about the potential negative impact on imports of services. In this case I don't see there will be a lot of negative impact. Many of the services that EU companies would be providing are services that we actually have an interest in. We have an interest in drawing on some of the expertise developed in the EU, on some of the advantages they have that they could bring to Canada and that could also benefit our economy at the same time.