I think in any negotiation you have to take account of what kind of negotiating partner you have. For a country like Canada, where we're often the smaller player in a negotiation—we were the smaller player in negotiations with the EU, and we're a smaller player in the negotiations with the U.S.—we have to accommodate our style and our approach to some extent to the other trading partner. The U.S. style of negotiating is very different from the EU style, and we will make those adjustments. Plus, we have Mexico, so it's a trilateral negotiation in this instance, as compared to that with the EU.
We've been doing a lot of research on what the U.S. will be looking for, looking not just at its stated negotiating objectives but well beyond that. We have a good sense of what it's going to bring to the table and what the value of it is. I think we're certainly well positioned to respond to whatever might come, very well prepared. The U.S. style is something we can deal with. We've dealt with it for many years. We've negotiated with the U.S. in various configurations, not just in NAFTA, but in other negotiations, and we know it well.