We have indeed changed things. Since 2013, we have had a new regime that is based on a public auction system, as I was saying earlier. That did not exist before.
Now, 25% of all timber volume from public forests is sold through public auctions. The results of those sales are used to determine stumpage fees paid for wood that is part of what we call guarantees. As a result, the fees for 100% of Quebec wood are determined according to the results of free sales based on free market rules. We asked that this situation be assessed on its merit in a new agreement. If the Maritime provinces or other provinces have considerations that enable them to be assessed in order to find out whether they can benefit from an exemption, I think that they have a right to benefit from a mechanism provided for in the agreement favouring a special assessment of a province.
In the new agreements, since forest regimes come under provincial jurisdiction, we want a mechanism to be included that could enable a province to have its regime assessed based on the changes it has made. We have been doing that in Quebec since 2013.