I think it's really important to close that loophole, and it's not something that would necessarily be that difficult. Some have said you wouldn't even need a legislative change, but I think it's better to have that, in terms of the excise tax. As you mentioned, a lot of different countries—I have a list of over 40 here including Albania, India, the EU, Russia, South Africa, Norway, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan—have all taken steps to close this loophole.
What I found interesting is that they're increasingly moving to not having a minimum threshold. I think it's because that creates complications in terms of the amount of business that they sell. We understand why there might be a de minimis in some areas, but I think it can complicate the issue if you're dealing with the issue of imports of digital services and you're relying on the producer in that way.
There's a very good report that came out, from the C.D. Howe Institute. I don't know if you've had a chance to read it. It's called “Bits, Bytes, and Taxes: VAT and the Digital Economy in Canada” and shows the different ways that businesses can avoid that. It's very important in terms of revenue, but I would say it's more important in terms of the jobs and the economic impact.
I think it's having a pretty serious effect on our main streets and main-street businesses, as well as on our cultural industry and its workers. It's extremely important. We've also seen a major shift of advertising dollars to digital platforms. That's another issue. The rules that are in place right now are very biased, and I just see it as a no-brainer to move on that.
I don't know if you had anything to add, Nathalie.