I want to drill down into what one of my colleagues was mentioned, and that's the staffing levels. I'm going to specifically reference your report, page 9:
2.46 Staffing levels. Agency officials told us that one reason for not examining targets was not having staff available at the time needed to do so. We found that the Agency did not continue its usual level of export control activities during temporary staff reductions, such as vacation, sick leave, or reassignment to higher-priority import control duties. We found that at one port of exit, no export control examinations were conducted when the assigned border services officer was on vacation. As another example, due to staffing fluctuations, the centralized unit that reviews rail shipments had once gone longer than a month without any targeting.
I'm curious, in your report, why did the OAG not specifically recommend that the CBSA review staffing levels?