Okay.
On the other hand, you mentioned that the U.S.A. is proposing an agreement that expires every five years. Coming from British Columbia, I can tell you that the perfect example is softwood lumber duties, right? Because it expires so often, every 10 years we are in the hole and getting back to the table. It's not very productive.
Is there any way that this softwood lumber deal can be part and parcel of NAFTA on a long-term basis, instead of for that small period of time after which we have to negotiate, going from agreement to agreement?