First of all, my thanks to the three witnesses.
My question goes to Ms. Dey, who can see and hear us. Your presentation was very enlightening. Earlier, I told Minister Freeland that we are going to have to study the two agreements, the current NAFTA and the NAFTA that might replace it, to determine which is better. We are going to do that work and do a study on the matter.
In general, you showed us that we need to consider much higher standards. The times are not the same. You said that, previously, the agreements contained no environmental standards for climate matters. There are few mechanisms that allow those cases to be decided, except the classic dispute settlement mechanism, which has never been terribly effective either.
Could you tell me more about good regulatory practices and about chapter 28 of the agreement. You see it as an attack on Canada's sovereignty. There was a similar chapter in the agreement with Europe. Today, Canada is in the process of doing the same thing to Europe. Are you really afraid that the agreement may be a genuine threat to sovereignty? Is that what you are saying?