Chair, I really feel for you in this position, because we're all trying to figure out how to do this.
Historically, what would have happened, when we chaired committees, was that we'd just have a general discussion on where we want to go and not necessarily even have motions in place. Motions may have to be more formalized in light of the fact that we're not all together. We're not in the same room. We're not having those side conversations at the same time. I think, though, when it comes to the main estimates, we don't have a choice. You don't need a motion. It's nice to have one, but we have to do it anyway, which is why I say that one is a no-brainer. That one should be done.
I agree with Ms. Gray that we can do that right now. Mr. Blaikie is saying the same thing. I think you're seeing consensus amongst the parties to at least schedule that one first.
The other clarification I would like to have—I just want to make sure I understand it correctly—is that anything we've done before prorogation is gone, and we have to start from scratch. Ms. Bendayan's motion, or what she wants to study, I think is a good study. I think we need to do it. I'm just not sure about the timing on it. It would have to start from scratch again, would it not?