My understanding is that one of those provisions has to do with the U.K. having this 2023 deadline for its cheese access under the WTO.
I'm trying to square the circle of, on the one hand saying, even though there isn't any hard sunset clause to this agreement, there are things like access to the Canadian dairy market that would cause the U.K. to want to negotiate a successor agreement. Then, squaring that with your statement that you're glad there's been no dairy market access concessions in this agreement, and that you won't make any dairy market access concessions in a future agreement.
If one of the reasons we can expect the U.K. to come to the table to negotiate a successor agreement is because their access to the Canadian dairy market is interrupted, how does that square with negotiating a successor agreement that doesn't provide any access to the Canadian dairy market?
Could you enlighten the committee on this?