Thank you, Madam Chair.
First, with regard to the priority of studies, I agree that Mr. Blaikie's is probably more timely because of what we're dealing with.
Mr. Sheehan, if you're agreeable, another thing that we could add in here is LNG. We could probably add in another 10, 20 or 30 items to the list.
Perhaps the best way to address this, rather than being prescriptive and listing everything we can possibly think of, is if we don't list anything and just leave it more general. Call it “clean technology” and then move on. Then it gives more options, because if this study isn't going to happen very soon, within the next week or so, there might be other emerging ideas that come to us. Rather than being so prescriptive, I would like to suggest that we just keep it general. Each of us, as we have different witnesses and ideas, can bring them forth at that time.