I'm just trying to understand. Is it the position of the government that Canada's support—or not—of the waiver proposal wouldn't make a difference either way? I mean, usually when things are proposed, you need supporters in order to get it through.
I find Canada's position somewhat odd, to put it really mildly. One is tempted to call it somewhat disingenuous, because the question is whether the status quo obtains with respect to intellectual property or not. We're in an exceptional position, and we recognize that waiving the typical kinds of intellectual property protections would have a salutary effect on vaccine production globally. Does Canada support the status quo or does it support the waiver?