Thank you very much.
I know the ambassador has said they're not hearing that the principal issue is intellectual property, but we're certainly hearing from some folks—if no one else, then the proponents of the waiver—that intellectual property is an issue. We also heard that time is an issue. Canada has not supported this waiver from the outset. It's been before the WTO going back to at least October. If granting some exceptions on IP is going to make a difference, surely it has the biggest potential to make a positive difference the earlier it's granted.
At what point does Canada recognize that its failure to advocate for this rags the puck to the point that whatever difference it might have been able to make is going to be far less than if Canada had joined others in proactively supporting the waiver earlier on?