My understanding by my conversation with them is that their intention was not to block, but to make sure that, when production delays were occurring at the vaccination sites, a similar amount of reduction was done for global exports as it would be done for their domestic European Union supply so that the European Union was not unfairly prejudiced by contracts abroad. That was their intention, not to physically block out other countries. In fact, the one that was refused was a European distributor, not anybody internationally that had commitments signed.
Is that what you heard as well, Your Excellency?