That's hard to say. I can't really get into the minds of other members. I would say this: There is a new proposal on the table. It might be as a result of the U.S. action, but I would also say that the new proposal doesn't seem particularly narrower than the former proposal, so I'm not sure if the proponents think they're closer or further from building consensus because of the U.S. action.
It's not at all clear how the U.S. intends to engage. Many of us had initially thought that the U.S. may be putting a proposal on the table. It's not clear that will be the case. It's not clear to us here in Geneva exactly how this will move forward or what the impact will be.
I suppose the meeting on the 31st might inform us to a certain extent.