Thank you.
We keep hearing how you're not opposed, and yet you're not supporting the text-based negotiations. You put out eight questions, along with Australia, Chile and Mexico, but these questions reportedly have been answered in detail, most notably in document IP/C/W/673. Would you care to comment on that?
It's one thing to say you're not opposing it, but if you're not actually getting to the table on the text-based negotiation, you're stalling it. Stalling it is, by virtue, opposing it.