Thank you.
Two bills have been brought forward in the U.S., one in New York State and one in California. The idea is to ensure the states no longer procure products that contribute to boreal forest degradation. That is the terminology used.
We are not against protecting forests, far from it. However, “degradation” is a broad term, so these bills could lead to new barriers to lumber exports. British Columbia and Quebec, in particular, would be affected.
Do you have any details on what constitutes forest degradation?