Yes. What the producers want is that the parties not use supply management as a bargaining chip during negotiations. They mustn't agree to allow a supply management breach in exchange for exporting certain goods, for example. The purpose of the bill is precisely to prevent that kind of bargaining.
I repeat, 16 free trade agreements have been signed without touching the supply management system. Proper negotiations are therefore possible with various countries if we put our cards on the table. Negotiators will be able to say at the outset that they won't touch the supply management system because a Canadian statute prevents them from doing so. That's how great and beautiful this bill is.
Negotiators don't consult Parliament every day when they sign an agreement. They subsequently say that they reached an agreement by winning on certain points while making certain concessions. Negotiators always open small breaches because they have the power to do so. If they didn't have it, the agreement implementing bills then tabled in the House would be entirely acceptable and wouldn't attack our supply management system, which has been in place for 50 years.