You're absolutely right. When you decide to repeal an act, you have to have good arguments and the support of the sector concerned by the act. The decision has to follow from a request from that sector.
I told you earlier that the Liberals gave answers that showed they were very much attached to the supply management system. Before agreements like the one with the European Union or the Trans-Pacific Partnership were negotiated, I saw the minister rise in the House and say that it was the Liberals who had established the supply management system and that they would always defend it. They did it even more when the United States was involved. However, did they mean that they would defend supply management 100% or that they would defend it while making a few minor concessions? When you concede 3% here and 3% there, in the end, 10% of farmers' incomes disappears. That's so significant that it can compromise a farm's success, particularly for young farmers who want to go into dairy production, for example.