Thank you, Mr. Forsyth.
Your answer suggests to me that essentially, you can promise anybody anything and then go and negotiate, realize that you can't keep your promise, and repeat the negotiating scenario from the last three agreements. That's what I'm hearing.
I would like to know what you think about the argument that it would attract attention to supply management.
It's a pretty crazy argument, that the effect of protecting the supply management system with a law will be to attract attention to the system. In the negotiations for the last three agreements, there was in fact no law that protected supply management, and there were major concessions. There is even talk of precedents.
I would like to note, for the committee's records, that the first concession was made under a Conservative government. Some people might therefore want to choose their words carefully when they are making statements.
Apart from that, with respect, I would like to know whether...