I would say they should eliminate the ISDS provisions.
The government said early that they are looking at negotiating agreements that are much more reflective of what is in CUSMA. I don't know why you would do something less in regard to a transition agreement with the U.K.
By the way, the U.K. was part of an agreement that they chose to leave. The reality is, of course, that the consequence of that is the world has changed, and we have changed our approach to trade negotiations; that's consistent. I think the U.K. should recognize that it has to agree to different provisions that may not be in CETA. Fundamentally, I would urge the government not to be consistent with CETA as they change provisions to reflect the new reality that is taken in CUSMA.