Absolutely.
I think CUSMA has fundamentally recognized the corrosive nature of chapter 11 in trade agreements. More importantly, I think the ultimate argument we make is that the domestic course is good enough for Canadian investors, if they have a claim against their government regarding infringement.
Why should foreign multinationals have a different mechanism? Why isn't our court system the place for them to seek redress if they believe our government action in some way impedes their ability to operate their business? I don't think there should be two mechanisms. Fundamentally, I believe the decision to eliminate this in CUSMA was the right decision. Equally, I think it should now be eliminated in any future new trade agreements because all it will do is continue to manifest itself in a way that will continue to undermine the democratic institutions of our society.