If that is the way to proceed, I have no problem with that.
I was asking you, however, to read back the motion that was adopted. As Mr. Hoback has just confirmed, we were keeping the first motion vague. Nowhere does it mention that it must necessarily be considered first. If that’s the case, there are some things that we have misunderstood each other about.
Therefore, I repeat my request: Can someone read what was adopted please?