The first thing I'd like to see is for Global Affairs Canada to support by doing a legal review on both bills currently on the floors of the legislatures in Albany and Sacramento. That's the first thing, which will confirm our belief that these bills would violate trade agreements.
Secondly, through diplomacy and working with stateside governments, partners in the U.S. and our customers in the U.S., we need to continue to share with them and have those meetings to talk about how our forests are actually managed here in Canada. There's a lot of misinformation. I think a lot of people forget that more than half of our forested areas in Canada are actually unmanaged. They might be managed by local communities in the far north, but 48% of our forests are managed. Out of that managed forest, half of that forest is under some kind of conservation measure today because forestry in Canada is inherently about conservation, local values and managing for multiple values, from species at risk to flood and fire risk mitigation.
A lot of work goes into the planning in forestry in Canada. It can't be simplified, which is what's being done in terms of the some of the terminology we're seeing stateside.