I'll just jump in on some of the things my colleagues have flagged, such as real supply chain issues and costs, and cost structures. We're seeing a huge issue with respect to rail service in northern Alberta in particular and, by extension, in other provinces. I know Susan has lots of issues in her jurisdiction because of floods, fires and the like.
The Canadian government can really look at infrastructure from a logistics perspective and from a rail company perspective to ensure that the rail companies are providing services that I believe they are fiduciarily charged to provide to northern communities. Most of our members in Alberta are actually only served by one of the rail companies. That has resulted in increased costs due to the lack of service on railcars this year. It seems to be an annual issue.
I think a real focus on our logistics and infrastructure needs across Canada and on rail in particular would be really helpful. It's not directly related to softwood lumber, but it's absolutely directly related to the cost of our industry. Reducing the costs will actually help viable forestry companies continue.