I agree with what Mr. Sobkowich said about the national supply chain office having identified that we are short a couple of trillion dollars in port infrastructure investment for the future. We are very much behind in having adequate port and transportation infrastructure to move forward. We are falling behind day by day, and we have to look at innovative models. That's exactly what I was proposing: think outside the box, use our marine highway and really focus on investing in port and transportation infrastructure. We still have just one railway going up and down the Fraser Canyon, and if anything happens to that railway, we are in trouble.
We have to have a more serious....maybe that's not the right word. We have to be really focused and identify a way to provide continued funding to enable our port infrastructure and transportation infrastructure, but ports in particular, to move goods on and off our shores. That's the only way we'll be able to grow. I believe that, with our railway saturated as it is right now coming from the west coast, we have an opportunity. The national supply chain office is a good start, but I also believe it needs to have the means to move things forward.
It all comes down to funding. We have to put some serious money behind it and really evolve—and I'm talking especially about the west coast—into the Asia Pacific gateway 2.0, where we include the whole of the west coast as an enabler in moving Canadian goods as we trade with Asia.