Well, you went to the wrong guy with one minute left.
The difference between our interpretation and their interpretation—and their interpretation was deemed to be wrong by the panel—would require more local content. I think they were trying to drive for more American content, in part to be able to qualify a vehicle. The challenge is that in a lot of important component classes like electronics or wiring harnesses, they don't exist in North America. You can drive a carmaker to a number that is unachievable, and the only penalty, if that carmaker doesn't achieve it, is a 2.5% tariff, and so we said that if they choose not to go on the 2.5% tariff, then they don't even have to meet the 75%: They could go to 65% or whatever works.
We really hope the Americans listen to their own industry, which is telling them that they all agreed on the interpretation that we all negotiated and that they should do the right thing and comply with the panel.