I just saw a series of presentations from Mexican specialists on the rapid response mechanism. In general, people feel it's been helpful in the broader process of labour reform. In Mexico, there's a general feeling, of course, that there's an unequal application of it to the United States and Canada. A similar mechanism should be in place that would not require federal approval for complaints about violations of labour rights. The ability to collectively organize and go directly to the rapid response mechanism, rather than requiring approval from Canadian or U.S. authorities, was one point that was raised. This would be significant. Expanding the priority sectors to agriculture would also allow, ideally, questions on migrant labour and the protection of migrant labour within Canada to be considered under CUSMA.
One of the other sectors that were raised was the energy sector. In relation to a question asked previously, it's notable that under the Mexican energy reform, one of the outcomes was the denationalization of the sector. This has led to a series of subcontractors for Pemex, some of which are U.S. and Canadian firms that are not easily governable. There needs to be a means of applying the rapid response mechanism to subcontractors in a range of different sectors. That's an area of concern.
Finally, in relation to an earlier question, the broader concern is that there are still state-to-state disputes regarding other concerns that have been raised. Trade is prioritized over social and environmental concerns that affect all residents of the continent. Thus, there is a need to have enforceable legislation that is not subject to cancellation by preferential clauses in the agreement that put an emphasis on the concerns of private firms over the need to enforce, for instance, commitments under the Paris Agreement.