I'm sorry, Chair. I have another point of order.
I'm not trying to be persnickety here, but there are a bunch of different amendments being proposed. The term “friendly amendment” was used. That doesn't exist in the Standing Orders. A member can propose an amendment, or they can propose a series of amendments, and things can be adopted by unanimous consent if it exists. If not, things have to be debated.
It's all one amendment. If so, it's now subject to debate.