Thank you.
Mr. Burton, you ended your previous intervention by mentioning materials and goods produced from forced labour. I put a question on the Order Paper last year asking for the total value of what had been seized. The only cargo seized was under a decision that was subsequently overturned. In the end, nothing was seized over time, whereas in the U.S., the value is at several million dollars. In the U.S., the burden of proof is on the importer, but under Canadian law, it's on the customs officer, as if the use of forced labour were going to be noticed by flashlight during an inspection.
Do you see a problem with the legislation? Is there some kind of gaping hole the size of the Grand Canyon?