Oh, did you? I didn't get one. Sorry.
We heard from the witnesses today and we know that there are financial implications of waiting another six months. As we heard, there's the cost of $20 million to the public purse, not including the missed revenues that could be collected using this new government system. I think as committee members we need to take that into account.
We also heard from witnesses saying, if we have to be ready, we'll be ready. We also heard that we need to help bridge some of the gap in terms of importers signing up for this program. I think there could be more work that we need to do with outreach to some of these importers and with the stakeholders we have here today.
However, bringing in a third party, wouldn't that add more costs to this important CARM program? I'd like to hear from members on that, because I don't think this would be beneficial, bringing in a third party when we know where we have to get to and we're pretty much almost there. This doesn't make sense to me. I'm just wondering if the member opposite can speak to what a third party would help with, maybe in terms of the questions that we heard from witnesses today.