Well, I think it might come down to capacity and political will. The truth is that the legislation in place in the United States imposes what they call a “rebuttable presumption”, so they presume that things coming from Xinjiang are tainted with forced labour until it's proven otherwise. That reversal of the burden of proof means it's really quite easy for U.S. Homeland Security to do quite a lot more to stop the import of those products.
I think it's down to the seriousness with which we take these issues, but also down to the strength of the tools we have. The legislation that the U.S. has is much stronger than everywhere else because of the rebuttable presumption.