I think the main barrier has been the U.S. industry. They're looking for restrictions on flows to the U.S. to drive up prices, which benefits them. In any sort of agreement, the way U.S. trade law is structured, they need to get buy-in from the U.S. industry for any sort of agreement. I think probably one of the bigger barriers is getting the U.S. industry to come to the table and sign off on any sort of agreement.
I think we have good precedents in the past and some of the past agreements looking for a long-term deal. There are different types of border measures that could be applied. Then, as I mentioned before, the deposits can be used in a strategic manner.
I think a long-term agreement is good, because what we need on both sides of the border is certainty—greater certainty around the softwood lumber trade and the use of duties to grow the market for softwood lumber. That's going to, I think, achieve objectives that both parties are interested in.