Maybe I'll start with that, and for the broader question I'll turn it back to GAC colleagues.
Yes, the requirement to have both houses of Parliament approve a resolution is within our domestic law, in the customs tariff, and it's part of the condition for this order.
I will note that we're one of the few, if not the only country among our like-minded partners that has something that can be done by order this way. Many other countries that take action on MFN require legislative changes. It's one of the reasons we were able to move so quickly to take this measure. However, there's also this 180-day requirement, noting that it is a deviation from our usual customs tariff.
In terms of broader bans, I will turn to Andrew to maybe speak to that issue.