I would say that, with our biggest trade partner, the U.S.A. and the CUSMA, we've seen much of that enforceability at work. In fact, we've seen not only state-to-state dispute settlements, but we've also seen a number of the rapid response labour mechanisms come to play. Those are the real examples of what enforceable chapters in trade agreements look like.
We don't have enforceability under CETA. For instance, we have very good standards under CETA for labour, for environment and for inclusive trade, but they're not enforceable. There's really no kind of ability to address non-compliance.
In terms of what we're seeking, I'd like to just say that there are many things that are different now than they were when CETA was developed as an agreement. We have so many global, life-changing events that, in fact, we need to have a much more collaborative, much more resilient—not just sustainable but resilient—trade agreement between two countries and between Canada and ASEAN, for instance.