First of all, I'd like to commend the Canadian government in one respect when it did come forward with what it called the most progressive and strongest labour chapter provisions, absolutely. Nonetheless, it's been rejected by Indonesia.
There are examples in the CUSMA that are quite good. The labour language is much better. It's easier to enforce. There is no onus on workers to prove that a violation occurred as a result of trade, which was impossible to prove in case studies brought under previous agreements. There is also this rapid response mechanism that, granted, is a bit heavy handed on the part of the United States in Mexico, but it's working. It's producing democratic workplaces in Mexico, overturning the bad unions and putting in place more democratic unions.