Second, you would have carbon capture, utilization and storage. If you go back, the U.S. had the 45Q tax credit. Canada proposed an ITC, an investment tax credit, for carbon capture. Our estimate was that the 45Q was about twice as robust as the Canadian proposal. Under the IRA, that's at least double. Our analysis says it's now four times better than what Canada's proposing. We have members who will tell you that when they've been in to see Finance Canada on opening up their books, on a project-to-project comparison basis, it's actually eight times better in the U.S.
Again, here's the most important thing: Under the IRA and the 45Q, it's just in the tax code. If you want to do it, the tax incentive is available. What's proposed in Canada is that you would have to get permission from the environment minister and the resource minister to obtain a tax credit, so—