We like to say that concrete is hyperlocal while cement is more region-based. We have 14 production facilities across the country: two in British Columbia, two in Alberta, five in Ontario, four members in Quebec and one in Nova Scotia.
Geography does play a role in the viability of the technology as it stands today. Both projects that have attracted investment to date in Canada are in Alberta. I think there are a couple of obvious reasons for that. One is that there's some infrastructure to transport captured CO2, and that's already been invested in. Of course, they have 1,000 years' worth of geologic storage in that province.
Part of the challenge for the cement sector and other heavy industries will be how to overcome some of the existing geographical and geological challenges on the storage side to make technology applicable in every region in Canada and around the world. There is a lot of promising stuff happening in that vein, but this points to Mr. Robertson's comments about collaboration with other jurisdictions. The United States is making deep investments in not just the actual capture infrastructure but also all the infrastructure—the ecosystem, if you will—that's required to make CCUS work. There are opportunities for partnerships that would open the door for broader and earlier applications of CCUS across the country for our sector.